Lucasfilm, Movies, News, Rumors, Star Wars

REVENGE REPORT: How Much of SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Is Lord and Miller’s?

how-much-of-solo-a-star-wars-story-is-lord-and-millers

When Ron Howard came on to “finish the last couple of weeks of principal photography” for Solo: A Star Wars Story, the initial understanding was that he was merely going to complete the film. If you recall, the film’s directors at the time (Phil Lord and Chris Miller) were only two weeks away from finishing filming when they were suddenly axed by Lucasfilm. Then, as Howard came on and his work would go on to last a few months instead of a few weeks, it got people wondering just how much of the film he was shooting.

In the time since, the consensus has shifted. Solo: A Star Wars Story evolved from a film spoken of us “Lord and Miller’s movie, with Howard’s steady hand there to smooth the edges” into “It’s basically a Ron Howard movie now.” So instead of asking how much of the film is Howard’s, the more pertinent question is how much of the final cut is actually from the original directors, Lord and Miller.

According to the Wall Street Journal (via CinemaBlend), which isn’t exactly some fanboy blog, we may have a very interesting answer to that question:

WSJ has a source that claims that Lord and Miller’s footage accounts for 30% of Solo: A Star Wars Story.

Of that 30%, you can safely assume that a lot of it is stuff that was shot for action sequences. Why can you assume that? Because the main reason Lucasfilm sacked the directors was because they didn’t care for the way they handled dialogue-driven scenes. It’s been reported before, but WSJ’s source repeats the idea that Lord and Miller took way too many liberties with Lawrence and Jonathan Kasdan’s script and kept pushing the actors to do more and more takes while improvising far beyond the written word.

It calls to mind what happened with Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, where Tony Gilroy was brought in to redo all of the connective tissue for the film while leaving Gareth Edwards’ action sequences primarily untouched. A big difference? Edwards still got the sole director’s credit, while Gilroy got a screenplay credit- with his extensive work primarily being kept under wraps (outside of one really annoying MF’r who wrote a ton about this in an attempt to to expose the truth at his old site…ahem).

While fans may be quick to compare this Solo: A Star Wars Story situation to what happened with Justice League, there are a couple of huge differences. Just in case you somehow don’t know what I’m referring to, Justice League director Zack Snyder was discretely shown the door during the film’s post-production and Joss Whedon was brought on to do extensive additional photography and reshoots. This led to folks playing a game of “Who Shot What?” while watching the film in theaters. And, considering we now know that a third of Solo is the work of Lord and Miller, comparisons will definitely be made and that game will likely be played.

But here’s what’s very different and unique about this situation, when compared to Justice League:

  • For Solo: A Star Wars Story, Ron Howard didn’t add in any new material. There’s no new/revised script. He literally just went back and re-shot a ton of scenes the way they were originally intended before Lord and Miller pushed things in a different direction. On JL, most of what Whedon did was write and shoot a ton of requested new material to replace what was there
  • Lucasfilm isn’t pretending this is a Lord and Miller movie, the way Warner Bros. peddled the false narrative that Justice League was “Zack’s movie”

To their credit, Lord and Miller have been very diplomatic about things. They didn’t even challenge the Director’s Guild for the credit. They agreed Howard deserved to be listed as the film’s director, and they opted to take Executive Producer credits instead.


ALSO: “SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Actor Dishes On Lord and Miller, Reveals Acting Coach Pushed Star To Channel Ford


The crazy part of all this is that Lucasfilm and Howard seem to have pulled this off. The early buzz on the film is decidedly positive. While our friend- and avid Star Wars fan- Dave “Da7e” Gonzales wasn’t all that impressed, most of what I’ve seen about Solo: A Star Wars Story is very positive.

Here’s a smattering of what’s being said, including Da7e’s Meh response:

I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: Every ounce of behind-the-scenes drama will be forgotten as long as the final product is well-received.

These new Star Wars films, since Disney’s acquisition, are proof of that since every single one so far (outside of The Last Jedi) has had some kind of behind-the-scenes issue (scripts tossed, directors replaced, release dates delayed, extensive reshoots) and yet the movies and Lucasfilm have somehow managed to emerge unscathed in the eye of the public. And that’s because, at the end of the day, as long as you succeed in satisfying their hunger…audiences don’t care how many cooks were in the kitchen.

Ok, I’ve got a DC Bochinche-centric episode of the El Fanboy Podcast to record. Catch you later, Revengers!

0 Comments

Michael Scarn

%d bloggers like this: